Commonwealth legal person to appear or to participate in a major ceremony wearing a real human hair wigs, then popular, and no mandatory law. Hundreds of years later, the wig is no longer fashionable to follow the tradition of the old-fashioned image has become a legal person.And wig unsanitary, and even some funny. Say change, however, is difficult. Solicitor to obtain the right to appear on the qualification because of not wearing a real human hair wigs to the House of Lords several times unsuccessful petition, many defendants choose to wear wigs appear barrister to defend them priority, is said whether wearing a real human hair wigs also directly related to the ability to persuade the jury!
Cancel juvenile Special Court for judicial officers to wear the wig practice in the United Kingdom in 1992, Australia consequences does not seem to happen. In 2003, the British were once the investigation of whether to remove the real human hair wigs, found that the majority of senior judges and solicitors want to cancel the human hair lace front wigs, you insist on traditional subordinate judges and court barrister. And 68% of the public wants judges --- especially in criminal cases --- wear real human hair wigs, real human hair wigs represent the symbol of justice in the UK public role still strong.
没有评论:
发表评论